[BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(+cc: bug-patch)

Hi,

Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 07:18:43PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:

>> Using --dry-run is fine, but omitting dry-run gives me:
>> 
>> ...
>> patching file arch/arm/common/clkdev.c
>> patching file arch/sh/include/asm/clkdev.h
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 11.
>> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>> arch/sh/include/asm/clkdev.h.rej
>> 
>> I guess this is caused by the last "renaming" hunk, see below.

Yep, I can reproduce this.  Patch applies with "git apply",
"patch --dry-run -p1" accepts it, "patch -p1" fails.

 $ patch --version | head -1
 GNU patch 2.6.1.85-423d
 $ cd ~/src/linux-2.6
 $ git checkout 2bfc96a12
 $ git clean -fd
 $ wget http://download.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel/8747/8748
 $ patch -p1 --quiet --dry-run <8748 
 $ echo $?
 0
 $ patch -p1 --quiet <8748 
 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/clkdev.h.rej
 $ echo $?
 1

Andreas: ideas?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]