On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:56 AM, viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 9/1/2010 1:20 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> Subject: [PATCH] send-email: Use To: headers in patch files >> >> It's a minor annoyance when you take the painstaking time to setup To: >> headers for each patch in a large series, and then go out to send the >> series with git-send-email and watch git ignore the To: headers in the >> patch files. >> >> Therefore, always add To: headers from a patch file to the To: headers >> for that message. Keep the prompt for the blanket To: header so as to >> not break scripts (and user expectations). This means even if a patch has a >> To: header, git will prompt for the To: address. Otherwise, we'll need to >> introduce interface breakage to either request the header for each patch >> missing a To: header or default the header to whatever To: address is found >> first (be it in a patch or from user input). Both of these options don't seem >> very obvious/useful. >> >> Reported-by: viresh kumar<viresh.kumar@xxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd<bebarino@xxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxx> > Cool. Junio, does this look good to you? I can squash in some tests later tonight if I get some git time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html