RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 22:14, Schalk, Ken <ken.schalk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> +       ln -s e a &&

>Due to this this (and maybe all the tests) need to depend on the
>SYMLINKS prereq.

I used a symlink here to try and duplicate the original problem case that a git user at Intel brought to me.  I admit I didn't consider the problem of testing on platforms without symlink support.

I'm having a little difficulty generating a rename/add conflict inside this test without using a symlink, which seems odd to me as the symlink doesn't seem to be necessary in an experiment I did by hand.  I'll either re-submit with this portion of the test conditional on symlink support, or with an alternate test that doesn't use symlinks (if I can get that to work in the test).

--Ken
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]