On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On further review you seem to be talking more about making fetch itself > peer-to-peer, only on the basis that that's what i believed would be a good start, lacking any experience or advice :) > where my patchset is more of a peer-to-peer branch-sharing > mechanism. what's the difference? i did look at making "blobs / trees" available but i figured that that would just get you a snapshot (not helpful). i'm afraid i don't actually know the difference between fetch sharing and branch sharing, as my knowledge of git internals is a bit "swiss cheese". > Complementary but not necessarily conflicting. Still I'll > hurry up and get it online :) commented already. was a bit of a bit message in the inbox, with an inline thingy rather than attachment, but i'll cope. l. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html