Re: [PATCH v2] builtin/merge_recursive.c: Add an usage string and make use of it.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now that you've researched it, wouldn't it make sense to include an
> explanation for this %s in the log message?
>
Sure, added an the explanation of %s in the usage string and the example too.

> Still, ack on this part.
>
Thanks.

>> @@ -37,19 +40,19 @@ int cmd_merge_recursive(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>>               if (!prefixcmp(arg, "--")) {
>>                       if (!arg[2])
>>                               break;
>> -                     if (!strcmp(arg+2, "ours"))
>> +                     if (!strcmp(arg + 2, "ours"))
>
> My comment on the rest still applies: it is best if patches do not
> contain unrelated changes to unrelated parts of the files they touch.
>
Reverted these style fixes in patchset v3.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]