Hi, My repository has several branches. Each branch is for a separate code release. Let's assume that I have a branch for V1.0 (branch_1) and a branch for V2.0 (branch_2). Some commits are relevant only for branch_1, some are relevant only for branch_2 and some are relevant for both. For the commits that are relevant for both branches, I thought about the following solutions: 1. Put these common commits in branch_1 and merge branch_1 into branch_2. This is bad because it will also merge commits that are relevant only for branch_1. 2. Cherry-pick the common commits from branch_1 to branch_2. This is also bad because the commit ID changes, and in case of conflicts, git is unable to tell that these 2 commits are actually the same commit. This makes it very difficult to track the changes between branches. Since there are several other developers and sub-maintainers in this project which are rebased on both these branches, I don't want to change the git history of my branches because when I do that, sub-maintainers and developers lose the reference to their base. I'm looking for a better solution. Is there any best-practice solution? Thanks, Erez -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html