Weather balloon patch. Doesn't seem to help much in benchmarks; in fact
I think it sometimes hurts a bit. Is it worthwhile just in case someone
comes up with a ginormous tree that is really deep with few entries per
tree? I'm leaning against it, but am sending the patch to at least show
others that it has been considered.
---
No signed-off-by, since I'm not sold on this patch and am somewhat leaning
against it. It would need a better commit message anyway. :-)
list-objects.c | 9 +++++----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/list-objects.c b/list-objects.c
index daa50bf..66e4ccc 100644
--- a/list-objects.c
+++ b/list-objects.c
@@ -61,13 +61,13 @@ static void process_tree(struct rev_info *revs,
struct tree *tree,
show_object_fn show,
struct name_path *path,
- const char *name)
+ const char *name,
+ int all_interesting)
{
struct object *obj = &tree->object;
struct tree_desc desc;
struct name_entry entry;
struct name_path me;
- int all_interesting = (revs->diffopt.nr_paths == 0);
if (!revs->tree_objects)
return;
@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ static void process_tree(struct rev_info *revs,
if (S_ISDIR(entry.mode))
process_tree(revs,
lookup_tree(entry.sha1),
- show, &me, entry.path);
+ show, &me, entry.path,
+ all_interesting);
else if (S_ISGITLINK(entry.mode))
process_gitlink(revs, entry.sha1,
show, &me, entry.path);
@@ -182,7 +183,7 @@ void traverse_commit_list(struct rev_info *revs,
}
if (obj->type == OBJ_TREE) {
process_tree(revs, (struct tree *)obj, show_object,
- NULL, name);
+ NULL, name, revs->diffopt.nr_paths == 0);
continue;
}
if (obj->type == OBJ_BLOB) {
--
1.7.2.2.39.gf7e23
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html