Re: [PATCH 2/4] rev-parse: suppress duplicate log limit exceeded message.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Ideally,  I think we should simply be reporting the log limit exceeded
> condition as a fatal condition on its own, and not reporting the
> ambiguous ref catch all at all in this case. We have already decided
> that the argument is a reference at this point and as such it is not
> really ambiguous, it just happens to be out of bounds.

A very good point.  Would simply replacing that error-then-return-nonzero
with a die work?  If so we do not even need to worry about new mechanisms
to cause different soft error conditions reported back to the caller to be
printed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]