Re: [PATCH 1/3] clone: do not accept --depth on local clones

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> clone_local() function disregards --depth. Make it more apparent.
>> Also hint users that file:// works with --depth.
>
> Hmm---why?
>
> The "--depth" option is an ugly hack that tries to conserve network
> bandwidth and disk usage, which is not necessary if you are doing a local
> hardlinking clone.  Without this patch we allowed people to clone with the
> option without a downside (allowing it didn't result in broken repository,
> for example), but with it, what has long been allowed suddenly stops
> working.  Is the breakage justifiable?

I also expect it to cut down history too. Maybe it's just me, when I
say --depth=3, 'git log' should give me more or less 3 commits
regardless what kind of transport I use to clone. Or we could make it
a warning, "--depth is ignored in local clone"?
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]