Re: [PATCH] t/t0000-basic.sh: Don't run a passing TODO unless TEST_PASSING_TODO=1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> E.g., something like:
>
> test_in_new_harness 0 1 0 0 '
>     test_expect_failure 'pretend we have fixed a known breakage' '
>            :
>      '
> '

Now the question becomes who tests "test_in_new_harness" ;-)

I'd rather prefer not to touch this one.  Isn't whatever the outer wrapper
used flexible enough to be taught about this kind of thing and filter it?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]