Re: [PATCH/RFC] updating examples/git-merge (plus a builtin/merge fix)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:51, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> While preparing to make some minor "git merge" changes, I noticed that
> the old merge script does not pass all tests any more.  Since it can
> be easier to prototype in shell and then port to C, I think that is
> worth fixing.
>
> Of course this is not urgent at all.

> Patches 2-7 are minor test changes.  They are early in the series
> to give flexibility about when to merge them.

Those all looked good, thanks for tackling that.

> Patches 8-10 expose functionality used by merge when handling octopus
> merges.

You mean 9-10, 8 looks good. I don't have the familiarity to comment
on 9-10.

> Patches 12 and later are ports of various patches to builtin/merge.c.
> I did the bare minimum to make tests pass. :)

Those also look good to my untrained eye.

How do you run the tests against git-merge.sh? Is there some make
target to use it instead of git-merge.c, or do you manually move it in
place?

If it's the latter a switch somewhere to run the test suite against
these .sh alternatives might compliment this series nicely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]