On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:30 PM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 12:18 -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote: >> Out of curiosity, why fall back to one chunk at a time? It seems to >> me that IMAP should be able to still support multiple outstanding >> requests in that case, but you'd just get errors on the latter chunks. >> >> It is just that there was no point optimizing the workaround case? > > There wasn't a lot of point in optimising it. Say no more :) I code on some IMAP clients occasionally and I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something important. Thanks! Avery -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html