Re: Git and Documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 15:31, Tomas Carnecky <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If the documentation is generated as part of the build, then there is no
> reason to have it part of the history - you can always rebuild it from
> the source. For the same reason you don't put compiled source into git.

Well, theoretically.

According to:

  http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.git;a=blob_plain;f=MaintNotes;hb=todo

the git project's repository itself tracks generated documentation for
practical reasons:

  The "html" and "man" [branches] are
  autogenerated documentation from the
  tip of the "master" branch; the tip
  of "html" is extracted to be visible
  at kernel.org at:

    http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]