Re: With feature branches, what is ever committed directly to master

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 14:02, Bradley Wagner
<bradley.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> what kind of stuff is ever committed
> directly to "master" or is master
> typically the place where things are
> merged into from other stable/features
> branches?
>
> Is "master" really even unstable at
> that point?
>
> Thanks in advance! I realize this
> question is pretty open-ended.

See here:

  http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.git;a=blob_plain;f=MaintNotes;hb=todo

The `master' branch is indeed considered the most stable version of
the software when it comes to the way `git' itself is maintained.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]