Re: fetching packs and storing them as packs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sean wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:00:54 -0400
> Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> What happens when the incoming pack (steps #2 and #3) takes 15
>> minutes to upload (slow ADSL modem, lots of objects) and the
>> background repack process sees those temporary refs and starts
>> trying to include those objects?  It can't walk the DAG that those
>> refs point at because the objects aren't in the current repository.
> 
> As long as there was standard naming for such temporary refs,
> they could be completely ignored by the repack process, no?

You meant I think: half ignored. Taken into account when finding
which parts are referenced to delete (-d part), but not complain
if they don't point to anything (validation).

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]