Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> *1* Also we would want to do something similar to the commit.util field so >> that more than one utility libraries can attach their own stuff to each >> commit. It _might_ make sense to instead get rid of commit.util and >> migrate the users to a separate "one object hash per one type of info", >> though. In any case it is a separate topic. > > I thought this already existed in decorate.c? Yes, the point is that there may be cases where it may be better to migrate some current commit.util users to that API. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html