Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > One question about test patches. Are you ok with test_expect_failure > tests that document the expected failure of a feature yet to be > developed, followed by the feature, followed by the patch that makes > the tests into test_expect_success tests, or would you prefer to see > the pre- and post- test patches rolled into a single test that is > delivered after the feature patch? I think a single patch that implements the feature and at the same time protects it with new tests from getting broken by others would be the best form. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html