Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 0/12] Re: rerere: let caller decide whether to renormalize

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jonathan,

Sorry I'm late to respond, I've just caught up with work after a long summer holiday.  It's back to working with complicated merges across normalization boundaries now, though.  This series looks like it's taking my hack in a sane direction, so for what it's worth:

Acked-by: Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@xxxxxxxxx>

Meanwhile, I've hit an annoyance: currently, files that are introduced with CRLFs on a non-normalized branch are left alone in the merged branch, causing the classical core.autocrlf problem of marking every line in such a file as changed if it is so much as touched.

I think the renormalization setting makes much more sense if the end result of the merge is normalized, so I'm working on a patch to make it do that.

- Eyvind

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]