Re: [PATCH 3/6] ll-merge: let caller decide whether to renormalize

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Add a "renormalize" parameter to ll_merge so callers can decide on a
> case-by-case basis whether the merge is likely to have overlapped with
> a change in smudge/clean rules.  This reveals a few commands that have
> not been taking that situation into account, though it does not fix
> them.
>
> No change in behavior intended.

Looking nice so far; I however think a separate "renormalize" parameter
should be folded into "flag" word, perhaps with a few new macros to make
it easier to access renormalize, virtual-ancestor, and favor-side parts
it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]