Re: [PATCH] Improve git-prune -n output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 2006, October 26 18:21, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> I do not have an objection to what this does, except I wonder if
> somebody's script relies on parsing this output already.

I did think of that, but the existing output looked pretty non-useful for easy 
parsing because of the fact that filenames where being printed instead of 
hashes.  If I were given free reign I think I'd want to drop the "would 
prune" message as well.

> It is customary to have one empty line before the S-o-b: line.

I didn't do it.  Git did :-)  I'll keep an eye out for it from now on.  
Apologies (as usual)


Andy
-- 
Dr Andrew Parkins, M Eng (Hons), AMIEE
andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]