Re: [PATCH 00/16] Subtree clone proof of concept

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/8/2 Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> haven't tested it further. Space consumption is 24MB (58MB for full
>> repo).  Not really impressive, but if one truely cares about disk
>> space, he/she should also use shallow clone.
>
> 58 MB for full repo?  What are you counting?  For me, I get 25M:

My number 24MB was incorrect because process_tree() leaked too many
blobs. It should have been 16MB. Anyway I have updated my series and
put it here (to spam git mailing less)

http://repo.or.cz/w/git/pclouds.git/shortlog/refs/heads/subtree
(caveat: constantly rebased tree)

if you still want to play with it. For number lovers, fetching only
Documentation from linux-2.6.git took 94MB (full repo 366MB). Yeah
Documentation was an easy target.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]