Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > Junio: ideally for this to work, git-pull.html would need to get the >> > same special treatment as git.html gets. Does that seem doable? Is >> > Meta/dodoc.sh still the script to do it? >> >> I am a bit reluctant to see stalenotes[] being abused; that ugly hack is >> in effect _only_ while k.org documentation is being built to hang the "You >> are reading the latest dev version, newer than anything released" sign on >> the front door. >> >> People with older git have documentation shipped with their versions, no? > > The problem is that google invariably turns up the 'master' docs at > k.org when you look for a git commmand (and that we point people to > them all the time on #git). Hence I suggested not outright removing > this safety warning from the docs that even people running 1.5.x will > read. I think the longer "In git 1.7.0 or later" with "Warning: in olden days" can appear in everybody's version without causing any harm. That way, it is shown even to somebody who came to docs/v1.7.3/git-pull.html at k.org from sideways. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html