Aaron Bentley wrote: > Andreas Ericsson wrote: >> The only issue I have with bzr's revno's and truly distributed setup is >> that, by looking at the table, it seems to claim that you have found >> some miraculous way to make revnos work without a central server. Since >> everyone agrees that they don't, this should IMO be listed as mutually >> exclusive features. > > The "simple namespace" is both a URL and a revno. > > And therefore, it's just as distributed and decentralized as the web. > > There is very little difference between this: > > http://example.com/mywebpage#5 > > And this: > > http://example.com/mybranch 5 > > In fact, we've been planning to unify them into one identifier. Well, then it is not much simpler than 8-chars sha1. And sha1 is more decentralized, because you can use it when you don't have access to net, and when the _central_ revno server is down. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html