Re: [PATCH] rev-list: accept --format without argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxx> writes:

> The documentation says the syntax is --format[='<format>'], match it in
> the implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Not that it's terribly usefull, but better be consistant ...

Hmm, I do not care too deeply either way as I do not expect anybody sane
to have used, nor learn from this patch and start using, --format without
any formatting specification, but it somehow feels that this patch takes
consistency the wrong way.

>  revision.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
> index 33fa0b5..4b64757 100644
> --- a/revision.c
> +++ b/revision.c
> @@ -1300,10 +1300,10 @@ static int handle_revision_opt(struct rev_info *revs, int argc, const char **arg
>  		revs->combine_merges = 1;
>  	} else if (!strcmp(arg, "-v")) {
>  		revs->verbose_header = 1;
> -	} else if (!strcmp(arg, "--pretty")) {
> +	} else if (!strcmp(arg, "--pretty") || !strcmp(arg, "--format")) {
>  		revs->verbose_header = 1;
>  		revs->pretty_given = 1;
> -		get_commit_format(arg+8, revs);
> +		get_commit_format("", revs);
>  	} else if (!prefixcmp(arg, "--pretty=") || !prefixcmp(arg, "--format=")) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Detached form ("--pretty X" as opposed to "--pretty=X")
> -- 
> 1.7.2.25.g9ebe3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]