On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Heya, > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 20:31, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> That's what made me think that >> sqlite might be a sensible choice, since it's already a database :) > > Sounds very sensible to me, especially the fact that (if it is indeed > fast enough, which I can't imagine it not being) it would make > development so much easier. At least, I think that having sqlite deal > with backwards comparability of your schema is easier than having to > manually do that? Also, sqlite is known to scale, is exactly one file > worth of dependency, what's not to love (other than having to support > upgrading to 'index vSqlite'). Even more sensible to replace all pack index with a single database. But then we could as well drop git object store in favor of Fossil (OK I'm going to far). -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html