Re: Sparse clones (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] upload-pack: support subtree packing)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(corrected reply context, sorry)

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2010/7/28 Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> 2010/7/27 Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> 0) Sparse clones have "all" commit objects, but not all trees/blobs.
>>>
>>> Note that "all" only means all that are reachable from the refs being
>>> downloaded, of course.  I think this is widely agreed upon and has
>>> been suggested many times on this list.
>>
>> I think downloading all commit objects would require very low
>> bandwidth and storage space, so it should be harmless.
> >
> > In fact, I have a pretty strong impression that also downloading
> > all *tree* objects would be fine too.
>
> Here you go. A pack with only commits and trees of git.git#master is
> 15M. With blobs, it is 28M. Git is not a typical repo with large blobs
> though.
> --
> Duy
>



-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]