Re: object/pack size x5 larger than a fresh clone?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hin-Tak Leung <hintak.leung@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> So I guess these *.idx without a corresponding *.pack are safe to
> delete? But git gc or one of the other house keeping commands should
> get rid of them though, I think.

I agree.  I think the dumb transports like http:// grab *.idx files
without downloading corresponding *.pack files when they encounter an
object that is not found loose in the originating repository to see which
packfile to fetch, but after they are done (or when they are interrupted,
for that matter), these *.idx files may not be getting garbage-collected.

And they should be, perhaps with or without some grace period (I don't
know which offhand---I didn't think this through).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]