Re: Avery Pennarun's git-subtree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Heya,

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 17:50, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> IMHO, the correct answer here is to have an inotify-based daemon prod
> at the .git/index automatically when files get updated, so that git
> itself doesn't have to stat/readdir through the entire tree in order
> to do any of its operations.  (Windows also has something like inotify
> that would work.)  If you had this, then git
> status/diff/checkout/commit would be just as fast with zillions of
> files as with 10 files.  Sooner or later, if nobody implements this, I
> promise I'll get around to it since inotify is actually easy to code
> for :)

>From what I've heard both SVN and Mercurial have something like that
and it's incredible unstable and icky and nasty and bad and will eat
your babies. Then again, I don't have any experience with inotify, so
if you say that it's all good and awesome, who am I to doubt that :).

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]