Re: Avery Pennarun's git-subtree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 22.07.2010 23:33, schrieb Avery Pennarun:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> But it's also clear that we have a lot of tribal knowledge about the
>> lackings of git submodule / git subtree. It would be *really* useful
>> if people like Avery and Jens which have obviously thought hard about
>> the submodule/subtree issues would draft up some (calmly written) docs
>> about how the two differ (with comparison tables etc.).
>>
>> That'd be a very helpful resource for Git users in deciding which one
>> to use.
> 
> I think I'm too biased to write that, but if someone else wants to
> take the lead, I could certainly contribute.

While I don't consider myself biased, I just don't know enough about
the details of the subtree approach to write that.

But I would certainly contribute to the submodule side of such a
document too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]