The 18/07/10, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:33, Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > if (!strcmp("master", current_branch))
>
> Wow, I thought the only place where we gave "master" any special
> meaning was in that we create it as the default branch. Can't we fix
> this to be less hard-coded?
To talk about pros and cons I wonder what would be the benefits of
changing this. I guess most projects probably best keeping the history
consistent for all the merge commit messages.
I think this is more sensible than giving the same behaviour /across/
different repositories (for only which not following the "master"
convention).
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html