Re: remove duplicate code and not needed break statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There were 2 cases on that switch statement which do the same thing.
in case 'P' there is an if-statment before.

Ralf
> 2010/7/18 Valeo de Vries <valeo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On 18 July 2010 18:49, Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Remove duplicate code and not needed break statement.
>>>
>>> On switch statements you can use multiple cases for one
>>> statement and on a goto statement you not need a break.
>>>
>>> From 5b3e7c8f8b81a295b5c58534be250f5a818ccc64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:48:58 +0200
>>> Subject: [PATCH] remove duplicate code and not needed break statement
>>>
>>> ---
>>>  server-info.c |    3 ---
>>>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/server-info.c b/server-info.c
>>> index 4098ca2..9ec744e 100644
>>> --- a/server-info.c
>>> +++ b/server-info.c
>>> @@ -113,11 +113,8 @@ static int read_pack_info_file(const char *infofile)
>>>                                goto out_stale;
>>>                        break;
>>
>> You seem to have missed another, or am I just lacking context? ;)
>>
>> Valeo
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]