Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab <at> gmail.com> writes: > Well, consider that even if you push most patches through, the peer > review you get from having a setup similar to Git's own might very > well be worth it. Everyone makes mistakes, having a second set of > eyeballs to look at your code eliminates a lot of that. > > That may not be acceptable to your corporate culture, but consider > that most big corporations (e.g. Google) do detailed code review > before anything gets commited to the master repository. Yes, that's a good point. We are trying to improve our code review processes, and I think switching to git is going to help with that down the road. I don't want to make the switch to git and a heavier (if better) process at the same time, however, as it would decrease the chance of either being accepted. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html