Boaz Harrosh wrote: > Ok I'll dive into "git-http-backend" (any pointers). The reference manual[1] is all I know of. Googling reveals a nice overview[2] by Scott Chacon. > Are you suggesting to > just drop the "git:" protocol? (Since "git-http-backend" is just as > good, through http?) Exactly[3]. > Thanks that actually helped Glad to be useful. :) Good luck, Jonathan [1] http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-http-backend.html [2] http://progit.org/2010/03/04/smart-http.html [3] Well, the protocol overhead is a little higher, but that is nothing compared to the difference between git: and traditional static http:. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html