Re: Question about 'branch -d' safety

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Clemens Buchacher wrote:

>          Maybe the real solution is a reflog for deleted branch
> heads, rather than being too careful about whether or not a branch
> can be deleted.

Yes, I think so.  Would there be any bad side effects to this?

diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index b540067..7ed0154 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -1084,7 +1084,6 @@ int delete_ref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int delopt)
 	 */
 	ret |= repack_without_ref(refname);
 
-	unlink_or_warn(git_path("logs/%s", lock->ref_name));
 	invalidate_cached_refs();
 	unlock_ref(lock);
 	return ret;
-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]