Re: 'git commit --short' without touching index?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> It would be nice if the index-refreshing code only wrote to the index if
> there was something worth writing. I'm not sure how hard that would be
> to implement, though.

Hmm, don't we already do that with "istate->cache_changed"?

In any case, we should diagnose "commit --short" (and "--procelain") as an
error, perhaps by splitting option parsers for commit and status further.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]