This is more lightweight than for_each_string_list function with callback function and a cookie argument. Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> --- Alex Riesen, Tue, Jun 29, 2010 10:35:15 +0200: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:33, Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > BTW, now that I took a look at it... The iteration over string_list > > items looks a little overengineered. At least from the point of > > view of the existing users of the feature. Wouldn't a simple loop > > be just as simple to use (if not simplier) and faster (no uninlineable > > function calls and argument preparation and passing needed)? > > > > #define string_list_foreach(item,list) \ > > for (item = (list)->items; item < (list)->items + (list)->nr; ++item) > > Rebased on current head (after Julian Philips patches). string-list.h | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/string-list.h b/string-list.h index 680d600..acf0450 100644 --- a/string-list.h +++ b/string-list.h @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ void string_list_clear_func(struct string_list *list, string_list_clear_func_t c typedef int (*string_list_each_func_t)(struct string_list_item *, void *); int for_each_string_list(struct string_list *list, string_list_each_func_t, void *cb_data); +#define string_list_foreach(item,list) \ + for (item = (list)->items; item < (list)->items + (list)->nr; ++item) /* Use these functions only on sorted lists: */ int string_list_has_string(const struct string_list *list, const char *string); -- 1.7.1.304.g8446 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html