Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> The revision walker produces structured output, which should be a >> little easier to work with than the text from rev-list. > > Hmm, doesn't it negatively affect later traversal you would need to do if > you smudged the flag bits by running revision traversal like this? I imagine so. I fear this would be the first git command to use the revision walker twice, and I am not sure whether we can really make that work. The revision walker uses object flags for the following purposes: - marking objects uninteresting/SYMMETRIC_LEFT. Luckily for us, if an object is uninteresting or SYMMETRIC_LEFT for the first --boundary walk, it will be likewise for pack-objects, too. - history simplification (TREESAME), --cherry-pick (SHOWN), --merge (SYMMETRIC_LEFT). There are already other reasons to disallow these features for bundle. - add_parents_to_list (ADDED, SEEN). This one is really worrisome; should we walk through again to throw away the added parents? Should there be a pass through all revisions to clear the ADDED bit? I’ll figure out a one-pass solution. :( Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html