Re: origin/branchname and tracking branch pointing to different commits?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:27:09PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> I have a slight suspicion that such an "unexpected ref update" is not a
> big issue anymore.  So in principle, I think it is fine to change the
> behaviour of "git fetch $there $these_explicit_refs" to additionally
> follow the configured remote tracking ref globbing patterns.
> 
> Because
> 
>  (1) the old patch was never tested in a production context (I don't think
>      it even hit 'pu');
> 
>  (2) I offhand do not know how much the codebase changed in the area that
>      would affect the assumptions the patch made back then; and
> 
>  (3) we will be in feature freeze for 1.7.2 anyway;
> 
> I would rather not be the one who is forward-porting the patch myself
> if I can avoid it, however.

I am probably the best person to take another look at it (though I would
be fine if somebody else wants to volunteer).

Right now I am in the process of switching day jobs and doing an
inter-state move, so it will probably be a month before I have a lot of
git time.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]