On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 16:46, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:14:59PM +0000, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:13, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Or even easier: is there a reason that "git fetch -q" would not do what
>> > you (Ævar) want?
>>
>> That'd reduce the verbosity level, which'd skip some messages that I
>> might want. E.g.:
>>
>> if (verbosity >= 0) {
>> fprintf(stderr, " x %-*s %-*s -> %s\n",
>> TRANSPORT_SUMMARY_WIDTH, "[deleted]",
>> REFCOL_WIDTH, "(none)", prettify_refname(ref->name));
>
> Wait, what? Isn't that line also part of the same human-readable status
> table? What makes the status of a pruned ref any different than the
> status of an updated ref? I don't see how that is an error message, but
> the other lines are not.
I misread that and picked the wrong example, sorry for the noise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html