Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > I'm in favor of the split mainly because it doesn't make sense to > re-roll your contrib/ patch everytime the infrastructure in vcs-svn/ > changes [...] > I want to get the contrib/ patch in so people can test > the infrastructure everytime it's re-rolled and goes to `pu`. Yes, I agree: ideally this should be two branches: rr/svn-export for infrastructure xx/svn-fe for the frontend with the latter based on the former. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html