Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2010, #02; Wed, 16)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Here are some comments and notes on various topics; this message discusses
only transitions from 'pu' to 'next'.

> * bd/maint-unpack-trees-parawalk-fix (2010-06-10) 1 commit
>  - unpack-trees: Make index lookahead less pessimal

I really need to come up with time to check this one.

> * ab/blame-textconv (2010-06-07) 3 commits

Type punning in textconv_object() needs to be fixed.

> * cp/textconv-cat-file (2010-06-09) 4 commits

Likewise.

> * ab/i18n (2010-06-15) 3 commits
>  . Add initial C, Shell and Perl gettext translations
>  . fixup! Add infrastructure
>  . Add infrastructure for translating Git with gettext

I haven't got around to fix conflicts merging this with various other
topics yet.

> * ab/tap (2010-06-09) 4 commits
>  - We use TAP so the Perl test can run without scaffolding
>  - Skip tests in a way that makes sense under TAP
>  - Merge branch 'jc/t9129-any-utf8' into ab/tap
>  - Make test-lib.sh emit valid TAP format
>  (this branch uses jc/t9129-any-utf8.)

I was not sure why TAP is worth the trouble, and I still am not sure.

> * jl/maint-diff-ignore-submodules (2010-06-08) 2 commits
>  - Add optional parameters to the diff option "--ignore-submodules"
>  - git diff: rename test that had a conflicting name

Is everybody happy with the naming of --ignore-submodules=<when> and the
semantics?

> * tr/rev-list-count (2010-06-12) 2 commits

I am not convinced the upstream selection logic between git/svn is right
in the tip one.  Clues?

> * tr/send-email-8bit (2010-06-12) 1 commit

If I am not misreading the patch, it does not seem to stop the scanning of
the "C-T-E:" header at the end of header; it should.

> * pb/maint-perl-errmsg-no-dir (2010-06-14) 1 commit

There was a comment on what the proposed commmit log message said
regarding $!; perhaps an update is in order?

> * zl/mailinfo-recode-patch (2010-06-14) 2 commits

The interaction between "-n --recode" needs to be fixed; it probably is Ok
to reuse "i18n.commitEncoding".  Opinions?

> * jn/grep-open (2010-06-12) 4 commits
> * jn/gitweb-return-or-exit-cleanup (2010-06-13) 1 commit
> * jc/maint-simpler-common-prefix (2010-06-16) 1 commit
> * mg/pretty-magic-space (2010-06-14) 1 commit
> * sb/format-patch-signature (2010-06-15) 2 commits
> * cc/cherry-pick-series (2010-06-02) 8 commits

I will merge these to 'next' shortly.

> * ic/maint-rebase-i-abort (2010-06-08) 1 commit
> * jk/maint-advice-empty-amend (2010-06-06) 1 commit
> * jn/document-rebase-i-p-limitation (2010-05-31) 1 commit
> * rr/parse-date-refactor (2010-06-03) 1 commit
> * sm/branch-broken-ref (2010-06-04) 2 commits
> * cc/maint-commit-reflog-msg (2010-06-12) 1 commit
> * lt/extended-sha1-match-commit-with-regexp (2010-04-23) 1 commit
> * jc/rev-list-ancestry-path (2010-06-04) 5 commits
> * eb/core-eol (2010-06-04) 4 commits

I already merged these to 'next'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]