Re: Pushing vs. alternates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxx> writes:

>   I don't have time to code that myself right now, so I'm just tossing
> an idea around - pushing to a directory with alternates set up should
> avoid sending objects that are already in the alternate object database.

That is probably only relevant for the first time, since
subsequent pushes have refs from its own repository that tracks
the tips of branches that was pushed for the last time.

And first time usage when you are initializing the repository
with alternates, you have direct access to that repository
(that's how you can set up alternates), you can as easily do the
initial fetch/clone as well at that time.

So it might be a nice addition but I suspect it would not matter
much in practice.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]