Re: [PATCH 1/2] format-patch: Add a signature option (--signature)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen Boyd <bebarino@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> I don't know how important people will feel this to be, but I've occasionally
>>> found it interesting to see how many people are using various different
>>> versions of git in a particular development community, and having the
>>> version in the signature is a useful gauge on that.
>>
>> The original motivation of the version signature was exactly that ;-).
> ...
> The real question is how useful is it to have the version number
> there? There are other ways to gauge the version usage and it's opt-in
> so you'll still get some version number coverage.

I sent the previous message without finishing that sentence.  I personally
have been feeling that the version number there outlived its usefulness
for quite some time.

If others (like Ted) find it useful/amusing/interesting, we may want to
keep the default and make sure it is not too easy to customize it away,
and I think what your patch does is fine.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]