On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:08, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 22:10, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 21:49, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I'll re-submit a version of the patch with a better commit message >>> which addresses all of the below. >> >> Since the series just made it into pu is that still wanted or needed? > > It very much is. There isn't that much difference between being in 'pu' > and being in the mailing list archive. Queuing in 'pu' is just to help me > not to forget about the series, nothing more. Depending on how further > discussions go, the series can be replaced with an improvement or even can > be dropped as a whole as unusable. > > In this case, the explanation in the commit messages and/or documentation > are found to be lacking, and you already know what the improved version > should look like, so I think it makes sense to replace the series with a > new version (v3?) Thanks for the explanation. I'll submit an better version of it soon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html