Re: [PATCH 0/4] Don't warn about missing EOL for symlinks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 03.06.2010 19:07, schrieb Jeff King:
I don't think "but they should be using plumbing to generate patches"
is the right answer, either. Yes, we expect the diff porcelain to behave
differently depending on configuration, but with the exception of
textconv, it always produces an actual applicable patch.

I don't by into that argument: You have to give --binary if you have changes in binary files. With Michael's patch, you have to give --no-textonv (too). I'm in favor of the patch.

-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]