Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/4] t/t8006: test textconv support for blame

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Diane Gasselin <diane.gasselin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>>> +test_expect_success 'setup ' '
>>> +     echo test 1 >one.bin &&
>>> +     echo test number 2 >two.bin &&
>>> +     ln one.bin link.bin &&
>>
>> Do you need a hard link? Can't you just copy the file at the right time?
>>
>
> At first, we wanted to test how links handle textconv but it behaves
> as regular file so the test is not really relevant. It will be
> deleted.

You do want to test what happens for _symbolic_ links (stored as blob
whose content is the target of the link IIRC). You probably don't want
to run the textconv filter on link targets. I guess you meant "ln -s"
here.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]