Re: [PATCH 5/8] revert: allow cherry-picking more than one commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 03 June 2010 01:37:20 Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > As a side effect, this unfortunately changes the meaning of
> > ‘git log --oneline --decorate --no-walk -5 --all’: instead of listing
> > five refs, after this patch that command would list the five most
> > recent commits.
> 
> It indeed is a change in behaviour, but in this case it is probably not
> such a big deal.
>
> The order "--all" (or "--branches" for that matter) lists refs doesn't
> have any logical relationship with the order of importance from the end
> user's point of view (they're just alphabetical), and asking for "first
> five" won't make much sense unless you are learning or testing the
> combinations of options, i.e. not in real life, I think.

I agree and I think Jonathan's patch would be nice to have.

Thanks both,
Christian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]