On 05/28/2010 11:21 AM, René Moser wrote: > Hi > > I use git since a while for my own projects (how surprise). > > The company I work for still uses a CVS(nt), and this sucks, time to > changed that. We have a use case we often have problems with. If git would > solve this problem, I would really have a good arg for the managers. > > The codebase managed by CVS is quite huge and therefore we have daily and > nightly builds. > > One problem we have is, that if there is a commit to cvs while the cvs > update of the build job is running (and this takes 20 minutes), then we > get some inconsistence, the build will fail. > > So the question is, if we would use git, this inconsistence would not be > possible because the git pull will get the state of the sha1. Right? > Right. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html