Am 21.05.2010 00:59, schrieb Junio C Hamano: > At least we should be able to let the users say, with "git status -uno", > "I don't care about untracked and unignored paths; I don't make such a > mistake to forget adding new paths", and optimize the scanning of > submodule directories taking advantage of that statement. Is there a > fundamental reason why things shouldn't work that way, or is it just a > bug in the current code? It works that way since 3bfc450. "git status" (and the diff family when comparing against the work tree) forks a "git status" for each submodule that is populated. If the status command in the superproject is started with "-uno" the same option is used for the "git status" forked in the populated submodules, so no checking for untracked files is done in that case. But that doesn't speed up that process much, as the tracked files inside the submodules have to be checked for modifications anyway, no matter if "-uno" is used or not. Getting rid of the fork of a new "git status" by using an alternate odb is on my to do list. Apart from gaining some time by avoiding the fork (which is a per-submodule-constant) we could terminate early in case we find a modification (instead of continuing as the current approach does). But only dirty submodules would profit from that, a clean submodule won't be scanned much faster that way AFAICS. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html