Re: [PATCH] Don't do status in submodules if status.SubmoduleSummary unset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 19:45, Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 20.05.2010 16:12, schrieb Alex Riesen:
>> Maybe because we do a (kind of) gentle status run on submodules
>> whether the status.SubmoduleSummary set or not.
>
> Yup, because checking a submodule for its dirtiness has to be done
> no matter if the summary output is also wanted.

Yeah. Why?

>> Usually a background
>> run of "git status" for every submodules goes unnoticed, just
>> sometimes a submodule is a little too big.
>>
>> I tried this, but feels like a bit of overkill.
>
> This patch seems to disable submodule output completely for the default
> case (when status.SubmoduleSummary is false) and breaks 17 test cases.

That's why I said it feels like overkill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]